INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY OF INFANT'S BEHAVIOUR = VARIABILITE INTRAINDIVIDUELLE DU COMPORTEMENT DU NOURRISSONTAUTERMANNOVA M.1973; ACTIV. NERV. SUP.; TCHECOSL.; DA. 1973; VOL. 15; NO 1; PP. 37Article

RELATIONS BETWEEN INTER- AN INTRA-INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY OF COLOR-MATCHING FUNCTIONS. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSVIENOT F.1980; J. OPT. SOC. AM. (1930); ISSN 0030-3941; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 70; NO 12; PP. 1476-1483; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

LISTENER RELIABILITY FOR A DICHOTIC TASKRYAN WJ; MCNEIL M.1974; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 56; NO 6; PP. 1922-1923; BIBL. 4REFArticle

LOW-VARIANCE STIMULUS-RESPONSE LATENCIES: DETERMINISTIC INTERNAL DELAYS.KRISTOFFERSON AB.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 89-100; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

CHANGEABILITY OF LIFE-STYLE AND PERSONALITY IN OLD AGE = LA MOBILITE DU STYLE DE VIE ET DE LA PERSONNALITE DANS LA VIEILLESSEKUYPERS JA.1972; GERONTOLOGIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 336-342; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES APPROACH TO MULTI-ATTRIBUTE ATTITUDE MODEL: AN APPLICATION TO CHOICE OF GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BUSINESSAHMED SA.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 103-109; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DEFINITION DE LA TACHE DANS L'ETUDE PSYCHOLOGIQUE DE LA PERSONNALITEPETROVSKIJ VA.1981; VOPR. PSIHOL.; ISSN 0042-8841; SUN; DA. 1981; NO 2; PP. 40-46; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF CONTROL COMPARISON TASKS AND BETWEEN-VERSUS WITHIN-SUBJECTS EFFECTS IN HYPNOTIC RESPONSIVITY.CONNORS JR; SHEEHAN PW.1978; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 26; NO 2; PP. 104-122; ABS. ALLEM. FR. ESP.; BIBL. 1 P.Article

OUTPUT RATES AMONG INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES.ROTHE HF.1978; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 1; PP. 40-46; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

SOME VARIABLES AFFECTING JUDGMENTS OF AUDITORY TEMPORAL NUMEROSITY = QUELQUES VARIABLES AFFECTANT LES JUGEMENTS DE NOMBRE TEMPOREL AUDITIFJOHN ID.1972; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 347-352; BIBL. 7REF.Article

DEVELOPMENTAL VARIABILITY IN REACTION TIME.ECKERT HM; EICHORN DH.1977; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 452-458; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN THE PERCEPTION OF VOWELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A PERCEPTION-PRODUCTION LINKFOX RA.1982; PHONETICA; ISSN 0031-8388; CHE; DA. 1982; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 1-22; BIBL. 3 P.Article

INTRAINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES DIMENSIONS OF MOOD CHANGE DURING PREGNANCY IDENTIFIED IN FIVE P-TECHNIQUE FACTOR ANALYSES.LEBO MA; NESSELROADE JR.1978; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 205-224; BIBL. 2 P.Article

UNE ANALYSE DES DIFFERENCES INDIVIDUELLES DANS LES APTITUDES DE LECTURE CHEZ DES ENFANTS A VISION PARTIELLEOKADA A.1975; JAP. J. PSYCHOL.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 165-170; ABS. ANGLArticle

ASSESSMENT OF 75/75 RULE: FDA VIEWPOINTCABANA BE.1983; JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES; ISSN 0022-3549; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 72; NO 1; PP. 98-99; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

INTRA- AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN THE POWER LAW EXPONENT FOR AREA SUMMATIONRAMSAY JO.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 6; PP. 495-500; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

EFFECT OF STRESS ON FIELD DEPENDENCE.SARRIS V; HEINEKEN E; PETERS H et al.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 121-122; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES WITH GENETICALLY HOMOGENEOUS LINES IF MICE AS A TERATOLOGY TESTING AND RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDUREKALTER H.1981; TERATOLOGY; ISSN 0040-3709; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 79-86; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

INTRAINDIVISUAL VARIABILITY OF CONCANAVALIN A BINDING TO THE PLASMALEMMA OF HUMAN SPERMATOZOACOURTOT AM; AUROUX M; OBRENOVITCH A et al.1981; ARCH. ANDROL.; ISSN 0148-5016; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 307-311; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

A CINERADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF VC AND CV ARTICULATORY VELOCITIES.KUEHN DP; MOLL KL.1976; J. PHON.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 303-320; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

CONTEXT AND COMPLEXITY IN WORKING CLASS LANGUAGERUSHTON J; YOUNG G.1975; LANGUAGE AND SPEECH; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 366-387; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

CUE UTILIZATION AND EXPERT JUDGMENTS. A COMPARISON OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS WITH OTHER JUDGES = L'UTILISATION D'INDICE ET LES JUGEMENTS D'EXPERT. COMPARAISON ENTRE AUDITEURS INDEPENDANTS ET AUTRES JUGESASHTON RH.1974; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 59; NO 4; PP. 437-444; BIBL. 17REF.Article

INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIATION IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTEPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAMSLOTGERING FK; WALLENBURG HCS; SCHOUTEN HJA et al.1982; AM. J. OBSTET. GYNECOL.; ISSN 0002-9378; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 144; NO 6; PP. 701-705; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

FILTRATION PRESSURE EQUILIBRIUM: A STATISTICAL ANALYSISOKEN DE; CHOI SC.1981; AM. J. PHYSIOL., RENAL, FLUID ELECTROLYTE PHYSIOL.; ISSN 0363-6127; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 196-200; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

EPOXIDE HYDROLASE ACTIVITY IN NATIVE AND IN MITOGEN-STIMULATED LYMPHOCYTES OF VARIOUS HUMAN DONORSGLATT H; KALTENBACH E; OESCH F et al.1980; CANCER RES.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 7; PP. 2552-2556; BIBL. 20 REF.Article