THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL CHANGES ON COMPONENT RECOGNITION = EFFETS DES CHANGEMENTS CONTEXTUELS SUR LA RECONNAISSANCE DES COMPOSANTESDAPOLITO E; BARKER D; WIANT J et al.1973; AMER. J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 85; NO 3; PP. 431-440; BIBL. 11REF.Article

MOVEMENT AND THE JUDGED DURATION OF VISUAL TARGETSLHAMON WT; GOLDSTONE S.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 53-54; BIBL. 4REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS VARIABILITY ON RESPONSE LATENCY IN A CONTINUOUS RECOGNITION TASKCICCONE DS; BRELSFORD JW; TULLIS T et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 6; PP. 456-458; BIBL. 10REFArticle

PHYSICAL SIZE SHIFT AND RELEASE OF PROACTIVE INHIBITION IN SHORT-TERM MEMORYELLIOTT MC.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 6; PP. 1216-1217Article

VARIABILITY JUDGMENTS IN A THREE-CATEGORY PATTERN CLASSIFICATION TASK = JUGEMENTS DE VARIABILITE DANS UNE TACHE DE CLASSIFICATION DE MODELE EN 3 CATEGORIESCORUM CR; BROWN BR.1973; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 879-886; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

RETROACTIVE INTERFERENCE IN SINGLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING.LINDBERG LA; BREHMER B.1976; SCAND J. PSYCHOL.; SWED.; DA. 1976; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 35-40; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

HOW SENSORY PROPERTIES OF FOODS AFFECTS HUMAN FEELING BEHAVIORROLLS BJ; ROWE EA; ROLLS ET et al.1982; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 3; PP. 409-417; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

CODING STRATEGIES, PERCEPTUAL GROUPING, AND THE !!VARIAVILITY EFFECT'' IN FREE RECALLELLIS HC; PARENTE FJ; GRAH CR et al.1975; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 226-232; BIBL. 8REFArticle

INCIDENTAL TRAINING IN THE TRIANGULAR METHODFRIJTERS JER; BLAUW YH; VERMAAT SH et al.1982; CHEM. SENSES; ISSN 505323; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 63-69; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

STIMULUS VARIABILITY AND AUDITORY FILTER SHAPE.PATTERSON RD; HENNING GB.1977; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 3; PP. 649-664; BIBL. 1/2 P.Article

READING ADDITION DETERMINATION WITH SEVERAL LUMINANCE LEVELS AND TARGET CONFIGURATIONSENG S; WOO GC.1982; AM. J. OPTOM. PHYSIOL. OPT.; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 59; NO 9; PP. 701-705; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDRENEGEL AL.1981; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; ISSN 0021-8855; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 14; NO 3; PP. 345-350; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

OEKONOMISCHE DATEN ZUR ERKLAERUNG DES ERNAEHRUNGSVERHALTENS = DONNEES ECONOMIQUES PERMETTANT D'ECLAIRER LES CONDUITES ALIMENTAIRESBESCH M.1980; AKTUELLE ERNAEHR.-MED. KLIN. PRAXIS; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 12-16; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

INCREMENTAL EXPOSURE FACILITATES ADAPTATION TO SENSORY REARRANGEMENTS.LACKNER JR; LOBOVITS DN.1978; AVIAT. SPACE ENVIRONMENT. MED.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 49; NO 2; PP. 362-364; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MAPPING OF SENSORY-RESPONSIVE CELLS IN THE SEPTAL AREA OF THE RATMERCER LF JR; REMLEY NR.1979; BRAIN RES. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 483-490; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

THRESHOLDS FOR SEEING VISUAL PHANTOMS AND MOVING GRATINGSMULVANNY P; MACARTHUR R; SEKULER R et al.1982; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 35-46; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

SELECTIVE ATTENTION TO STIMULUS COMPONENTS IN CHILDREN'S DIRECT AND OBSERVATIONAL LEARNINGOHNOGI H.1982; JPN. PSYCHOL. RES.; ISSN 0021-5368; JPN; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 101-105; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE ON RESPONDING OF SQUIRREL MONKEYS MAINTAINED UNDER SECOND-ORDER SCHEDULES OF FOOD PRESENTATION, ELECTRIC SHOCK PRESENTATION OF STIMULUS-SHOCK TERMINATIONBARRETT JE; KATZ JL; GLOWA JR et al.1981; J. PHARMACOL. EXP. THER.; ISSN 0022-3565; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 218; NO 3; PP. 692-700; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STIMULUS VARIATION AND THE FORMATION OF MISCONCEPTIONSCARNINE D.1980; J. EDUC. RES.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 106-110; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

BRAIN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS AS INDICATORS OF EARLY SELECTIVE PROCESSES IN AUDITORY TARGET LOCALIZATIONMCCALLUM WC; CURRY SH; COOPER R et al.1983; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ISSN 0048-5772; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 1-17; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

CONCURRENT AUTOMATIC AND CONTROLLED VISUAL SEARCH: CAN PROCESSING OCCUR WITHOUT RESOURCE COST.SCHNEIDER W; FISK AD.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., LEARN. MEM. CONG.; ISSN 504254; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 4; PP. 261-278; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

DIFFERENTIAL RECOGNITION OF THE LEFT VS. THE RIGHT SIDE OF HUMAN FACESKENNEDY D; BEARD D; CARR WJ et al.1982; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 72-73; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIP OF ESTIMATED COMPREHENSIBILITY TO THE RATE OF CONNECTED SPEECHDE HAAN HJ.1982; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 27-31; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF NUTRITION AND PERIPHERAL STIMULI ON PREFERENCES FOR FAMILIAR FOODS IN THE BANK VOLEPARTRIDGE L; MACLEAN R.1981; ANIM. BEHAV.; ISSN 0003-3472; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 217-220; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

PREFERENCES AMONG STIMULUS MATCHES IN THE PIGEONPISACRETA R.1982; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 191-199; BIBL. 2 P.Article