USE AND INTERPRETATION OF COMMON STATISTICAL TESTS IN METHOD-COMPARISON STUDIESWESTGARD JO; HUNT MR.1973; CLIN. CHEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 49-57; BIBL. 20 REF.Serial Issue

POWER FUNCTIONS FOR STATISTICAL CONTROL RULESWESTGARD JO; GROTH T.1979; CLIN. CHEM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 6; PP. 863-869; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

WHAT IS THE QUALITY OF QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES.DE VERDIER CH; GROTH T; WESTGARD JO et al.1981; SCAND. J. CLIN. LAB. INVEST.; ISSN 0036-5513; NOR; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 1-14; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR THE DESIGN OF STATISTICAL CONTROL PROCEDURES IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRYGROTH T; FALK H; WESTGARD JO et al.1981; COMPUT. PROGRAMS BIOMED.; ISSN 0010-468X; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 1-2; PP. 73-86; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO "REFEREE" METHODS IN METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES.CAREY RN; WOLD S; WESTGARD JO et al.1975; ANAL. CHEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 47; NO 11; PP. 1824-1829; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE STUDIES ON THE TECHNICON "SMAC" ANALYZER: PRECISION AND COMPARISON OF VALUES WITH METHODS IN ROUTINE LABORATORY SERVICE.WESTGARD JO; CAREY RN; FELDBRUEGGE DH et al.1976; CLIN. CHEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 489-496; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

TREND DETECTION IN CONTROL DATA: OPTIMIZATION AND INTERPRETATION OF TRIGG'S TECHNIQUE FOR TREND ANALYSIS.CEMBROWSKI GS; WESTGARD JO; EGGERT AA et al.1975; CLIN. CHEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 21; NO 10; PP. 1396-1405; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON DATA. TESTING NORMALITYCEMBROWSKI GS; WESTGARD JO; CONOVER WJ et al.1979; AMER. J. CLIN. PATHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 21-26; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

CONTRIBUTION OF ARTERIAL BLOOD LACTATE MEASUREMENT TO THE CARE OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS.ANDERSON CT JR; WESTGARD JO; SCHLIMGEN K et al.1977; AMER. J. CLIN. PATHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 68; NO 1; PP. 63-67; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

ASSESSMENT OF THE SERUM SEPARATOR TUBE AS AN INTERMEDIATE STORAGE DEVICE WITHIN THE LABORATORY.LAESSIG RH; HASSEMER DJ; WESTGARD JO et al.1976; AMER. J. CLIN. PATHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 653-657; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

CONCEPTS AND PRACTICES IN THE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY METHODS. III. STATISTICS.WESTGARD JO; DE VOS DJ; HUNT MR et al.1978; AMER. J. MED. TECHNOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 44; NO 6; PP. 552-571Article

CONCEPTS AND PRACTICES IN THE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY METHODS. V. APPLICATIONS.WESTGARD JO; DE VOS DJ; HUNT MR et al.1978; AMER. J. MED. TECHNOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 44; NO 8; PP. 803-813; BIBL. 1 P.Article

A COMPARISON OF HARD AND SOFT GLASS BLOOD-DRAWING TUBESLAESSIG RH; HASSEMER DJ; HOFFMAN GL et al.1979; AMER. J. CLIN. PATHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 72; NO 6; PP. 952-955; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ASSESSMENT FOR A SERUM SEPARATOR DEVICE FOR OBTAINING SERUM SPECIMENS SUITABLE FOR CLINICAL ANALYSES.LAESSIG RH; WESTGARD JO; CAREY RN et al.1976; CLIN. CHEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 235-239; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A CANDIDATE REFERENCE METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF TOTAL PROTEIN IN SERUM. II: TEST FOR TRANSFERABILITYDOUMAS BT; BAYSE DD; BORNER K et al.1981; CLIN. CHEM.; ISSN 0009-9147; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 27; NO 10; PP. 1651-1654; BIBL. 7 REF.Article