DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDENT OPINION SURVEYDOYLE KO JR.1977; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1977; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 439-443; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

Les enjeux de la reconnaissance du «risque social» en marketing-achatLEROUX-SOSTENES, M. J; GODEY, B.Congrès de l'Association Française de Marketing. 1999, Tome 2, 885-909Conference Paper

THE SWEDISH NUCLEAR REFERENDUM 1980ZETTERBERG HL.1981; URANIUM AND NUCLEAR ENERGY: 1980. URANIUM INSTITUTE. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM. 5/1980/LONDON; GBR; GUILDFORD: WESTBURY HOUSE; DA. 1981; PP. 245-274; BIBL. 10 REF.Conference Paper

EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE METHOD OF OBTAINING ATTITUDE AND OPINION DATA FROM "HARD TO SAMPLE" POPULATIONS.OWENS WH JR; CAPEL WC.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 751-754; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

Consultation publique, aménagement du territoire et apprentissage collectif : l'exemple de la gestion des déchets à MontréalDE CARLO, L.1996, 14 p.Book

LIBRE OPINION: LA NOUVELLE RADIOLOGIEGEINDRE M.1982; J. RADIOL.; ISSN 0242-3081; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 63; NO 4; PP. 295-297; ABS. ENGArticle

LE POINT DE VUE DES MEDECINS, GENERALISTES ET PEDIATRES, SUR LES VACCINATIONS, D'APRES UNE ENQUETE D'OPINION REALISEE EN AUVERGNEMENUT G; TEYSONNEYRE MF.1978; MED. MAL. INFECT.; FRA; DA. 1978; VOL. 8; 11 BIS PART. 2; PP. 640-644; ABS. ENGConference Paper

ENVIRONMENTALISTS' AND BUSINESS EXECUTIVES' ATTITUDES AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE NUCLEAR POWER CONTROVERSY.BASS BM; BASS R; SHAPIRA Z et al.1977; INTERNATION. J. ENVIRONMENT. STUD.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 79-83; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE INDUCTION OF SUSTAINED RECYCLING BEHAVIOR THROUGH THE FOOT-IN-THE-DOOR TECHNIQUE.ARBUTHNOT J; TEDESCHI R; WAYNER M et al.1976; J. ENVIRONMENT. SYST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976-1977; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 355-368; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

Integrating lay public opinions in cost benefit valuations = Intégrer l'opinion publique dans l'analyse coûts-avantagesPLACER, V.1997, 10 p.Book

Consequences of public scrutiny for leaders and their organizations = Conséquences du regard public sur les leaders et leurs organisationsSUTTON, R. I; GALUNIC, D. C.1995, 61 p.Book

REMOVING THE BARRIERS FOR NEW NUCLEAR ELECTRIC GENERATIONDAVIS OH.1980; ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 7. EXPANDING SUPPLIES AND CONSERVATION. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. 7/1980/WASHINGTON DC; USA; WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC.; DA. 1980; PP. 1081-1085Conference Paper

ATTITUDES AND NONATTITUDES IN THE BELIEF SYSTEMS OF MASS PUBLICSBISHOP GD; HAMILTON DL; MCCONAHAY JB et al.1980; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 110; NO 1; PP. 53-64; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

EVALUATION PRELIMINAIRE DES OPINIONS DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA VIE SEXUELLE DES JEUNESGROMSKA J.1978; PSYCHIATR. POLSKA; POLSKA; DA. 1978; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 49-56; ABS. RUSSE ANGL.; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

GENEHMIGUNGSVERFAHREN - ZIELE UND PROBLEME AUS DER SICHT DES BURGERS. = LICENCING PROCEDURE. PURPOSES AND PROBLEMS FROM THE CITIZEN VIEW POINT = PROCEDURES D'AUTORISATION. BUTS ET PROBLEMES DU POINT DE VUE DU CITOYENZILLESSEN H.1977; IN: ENVITEC '77. ENERG. UMWELT. KONGR. BERICHTSWERK; DUESSELDORF; 1977; ESSEN; VULKAN-VERLAG; DA. 1977; PP. 135-138; BIBL. 8 REF.Conference Paper

PSYCHOLOGY'S CONTEMPORARY AND ALL-TIME NOTABLES: STUDENT, FACULTY, AND CHAIRPERSON VIEWPOINTSDAVIS SF; THOMAS RL; WEAVER MS et al.1982; BULL. PSYCHOM. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 3-6; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

L'OPINION PUBLIQUE FACE A L'ENERGIE NUCLEAIRE = THE PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT THE NUCLEAR ENERGYHERSCH J.1982; NUCLEAR ENERGY - EUROPE AND THE WORLD. FORATOM 8. FORATOM CONGRESS. 8/1982-06-20/LAUSANNE; CHE; DA. 1982; 10 P.Conference Paper

LA GESTION SOCIALE DES SILENCESDE SINGLY F.1982; CONSOMMATION; ISSN 0010-6593; FRA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 4; PP. 37-63; BIBL. 41 REF.Article

SOME AUSTRALIAN ATTITUDES ON ENERGYWEST J; TAPP B.1980; SEARCH (SYD.); ISSN 0371-2516; AUS; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 11; PP. 364-366; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

Intégration de l'environnement dans la stratégie d'entreprise. Cas d'application : EDF = Integration of environmental issues in corporate strategy. Case study EDFALLIAUME, V; BARRE, R.1996, 2Vol, (660 p.)Thesis

What lies behind public acceptance ? Comparison of US and French perceptions of the nuclear power option = Qu'y a-t-il derrière l'acceptation de l'opinion publique ? Comparaison entre les perceptions américaine et française du choix de l'énergie nucléairePOUMADERE, M.1994, 14 p.Book

SOME IMPLICATIONS OF THE ENERGY DEBATE FOR SOCIETYLYONS J.1981; J.-SOC. ENG.; ISSN 0370-9523; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 72; NO 3; PP. 143-156Article

DENTAL ESTHETIC SELF-EVALUATION AND SATISFACTIONGRABER LW; LUCKER GW.1980; AMER. J. ORTHODONT.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 77; NO 2; PP. 163-173; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

MONOMORPHIC AND POLYMORPHIC OPINION LEADERSHIP WITHIN A RELATIVELY CLOSED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMRICHMOND VP.1980; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 111-116; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL AND CONDITIONAL INFERENCE PROCESSES IN BELIEF FORMATION AND CHANGEWYER RS JR; HARTWICK J.1980; ADV. EXP. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0065-2601; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; PP. 241-284; BIBL. 3 P.Article