PREDICTIVE VALUE OF SAT SCORES AND HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT FOR SUCCESS IN A COLLEGE HONORS PROGRAMMCDONALD RT; GAWKOSKI RS.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 411-414; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

LES CAHIERS IC₄, V₄, N₄ ET S₄ANH NGUYEN XUAN.1971; B.I.N.O.P.; FR.; DA. 1971; VOL. 27; NO 5; PP. 346-360Article

THE MODIFIED GATB (M) AS A MEASURE OF RECOVERY FROM GENERAL ANESTHESIALETOURNEAU JE; DENIS R.1983; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 56; NO 2; PP. 451-458; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PREDICTING FRESHMAN GPA OF LAW/JUSTICE STUDENTSWIDERSTROM AH; JENGELESKI JL; CHANSKY NM et al.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 439-443; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

FUNDAMENTAL MEASUREMENT OF THE DIFFICULTY OF TEST ITEMSLEVINE MV.1982; JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-2496; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 243-268; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE FACTORIAL STRUCTURE OF THE GENERAL APTITUDE TEST BATTERYWATTS FN; EVERITT BS.1980; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9762; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 763-767; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT TESTS AS A PREDICTOR OF COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION BOARD SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST SCORESDOEBLER LK; FOREMAN ST.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 4; PP. 909-911; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF SPECIAL PREPARATION ON SAT-VERBAL SCORESALDERMAN DL; POWERS DE.1980; AMER. EDUC. RES. J.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 239-251; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF COMMERCIAL TEST PREPARATION COURSES ON SAT SCORESSESNOWITZ M; BERNHARDT KL; KNAIN DM et al.1982; AM. EDUC. RES. J.; ISSN 0002-8312; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 429-441; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

USING EMPIRICAL BAYES TECHNIQUES IN THE LAW SCHOOL VALIDITY STUDIESRUBIN DB; DEMPSTER AP; KAYE D et al.RUBIN DB; 1980; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 0003-1291; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 75; NO 372; PP. 801-827; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

VERBAL SKILLS AS FACTORS IN THE PASSAGELESS VALIDATION OF READING COMPREHENSION TESTSFOWLER B; KROLL BM.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 1; PP. 335-338; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

GELDIGHEIDSDUUR VAN TESTRESULTATEN: STABILITEIT VAN SCORES EN SCOREWINST BIJ HERTEST. = DUREE DE VALIDITE DE RESULTATS OBTENUS AUX TESTS: STABILITE DES SCORES ET DE LEUR GAIN DANS LE RETESTALGERA JA.1977; NEDERL. T. PSYCHOL.; NEDERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 32; NO 7; PP. 423-430; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

NADER'S RAID ON THE TESTING INDUSTRY. IS IT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CONSUMER.KAPLAN RM.1982; AM. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0003-066X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 15-23; BIBL. 1 P.Article

STUDENT SELF-SELECTION AND TEST REPETITIONALDERMAN DL.1981; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 4; PP. 1073-1081; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE CORRELATION OF PARTIAL AND TOTAL SCORES OF THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST OF THE COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION BOARD WITH GRADES IN FRESHMAN CHEMISTRYPEDERSEN LG.1975; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 2; PP. 509-511; BIBL. 3REFArticle

USE OF THE MINNESOTA RATE OF MANIPULATION TEST FOR DISABILITY EVALUATIONGLOSS DS; WARDLE MG.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 2; PP. 521-532; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE DIFFERENTIAL APTITUDE TESTS AS PREDICTORS OF SUCESS IN A HIGH SCHOOL FOR ENGINEERING PROGRAMOMIZO MM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 197-203; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

CLOZE PROCEDURE AND EQUIVALENCEPORTER D.1978; LANGUAGE LEARNG; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 333-341; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PYRAMID POWER: SEARCHING FOR AN ERROR IN TEST SCORING WITH 830000 HELPERSWAINER H.1983; AMERICAN STATISTICIAN; ISSN 0003-1305; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 87-91; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

TIME AND METHOD IN COACHING FOR THE SATMESSICK S; JUNGEBLUT A.1981; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 89; NO 2; PP. 191-216; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACHIEVEMENT TESTS IN COMPARISON WITH THE ACT ASSESSMENT, COLLEGE BOARD SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST, AND HIGH SCHOOL GRADE POINT AVERAGE IN PREDICTING COLLEGE GRADE POINT AVERAGEHALPIN G; HALPIN G; HALPIN G; HALPIN G; SCHAER BB et al.1981; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 41; NO 3; PP. 821-827; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

HOLLAND PERSONNALITY TYPES AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTSCHNEIDER LJ; OVERTON TD.1983; JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-0167; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 287-289; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A NEW MODEL FOR VALIDITY GENERALIZATIONCALLENDER JC; OSBURN HG.1980; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 65; NO 5; PP. 543-558; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE VALIDITY OF THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST IN IRANHOSSEINI AA.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 99-102; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

RELATIONSHIPS OF PERCEIVED JOB DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS TO JOB ABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND JOB VALUE.DUNHAM RB.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 6; PP. 760-763; BIBL. 4 REF.Article